<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Professional Geekism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ninjabadger.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net</link>
	<description>Ninjas. Badgers. Linux. Me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TFTP Server via Netgear DB834GT by peter</title>
		<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net/2008/01/14/tftp-server-via-netgear-db834gt/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninjabadger.net/2008/01/14/tftp-server-via-netgear-db834gt/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>busybox does allow you to compile and install the &#039;bin/busybox&#039; binary in a target directory, this would make the changes permanent for udhcpd on the Netgear 

http://linux.die.net/man/1/busybox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>busybox does allow you to compile and install the &#8216;bin/busybox&#8217; binary in a target directory, this would make the changes permanent for udhcpd on the Netgear </p>
<p><a href="http://linux.die.net/man/1/busybox" rel="nofollow">http://linux.die.net/man/1/busybox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dell 6224 switch &#8216;Oversize Packets&#8217; counter by jeangaud</title>
		<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net/2011/01/28/dell-6224-switch-oversize-packets-counter/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>jeangaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninjabadger.net/?p=131#comment-114</guid>
		<description>copy of your configuration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>copy of your configuration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dell 6224 switch &#8216;Oversize Packets&#8217; counter by jeangaud</title>
		<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net/2011/01/28/dell-6224-switch-oversize-packets-counter/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>jeangaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninjabadger.net/?p=131#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I too was wondering if it was an error... I&#039;m glad someone came across the tech support to find out :)

Do you have 2 switches stacked together?

I do have another concern though, the Transmitted Pause Frames is growing, and I don&#039;t know if this is causing me Packet Errors on one interface on the SAN.

Can you send me a copy of your switch, so I can compare with mine? 
Thanks!!

Jean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I too was wondering if it was an error&#8230; I&#8217;m glad someone came across the tech support to find out <img src='http://www.ninjabadger.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Do you have 2 switches stacked together?</p>
<p>I do have another concern though, the Transmitted Pause Frames is growing, and I don&#8217;t know if this is causing me Packet Errors on one interface on the SAN.</p>
<p>Can you send me a copy of your switch, so I can compare with mine?<br />
Thanks!!</p>
<p>Jean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPv6 on m0n0wall by Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net/2010/02/17/ipv6-on-m0n0wall/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 16:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninjabadger.net/?p=124#comment-112</guid>
		<description>The first step, in m0n0wall at least, is to head into &#039;System: Advanced&#039; and check the box that says &#039;IPv6 Support&#039;. Without that, you won&#039;t have half the options you need.

From memory, the GUI of pfSense is very similar, but to my knowledge it&#039;s got very flakey support for IPv6 (or none, if you count only stable releases). I&#039;d check that your build actually has v6 support first.

LAN: Add the IPv6 prefix in the appropriate box, enable RA.
WAN: This is dependant on your ISP. Is it Andrews &amp; Arnold? If so, you just need to the &#039;IPv6 mode&#039; to &#039;PPP&#039;, and the routing of your prefix from the LAN to the world will &#039;just work&#039;. :)

The firewall, from memory, doesn&#039;t allow any v6 out by default (in contrast, it does for v4). On the &#039;IPv6 Rules&#039; page you should just be able to add a rule that allows anything from the &#039;LAN subnet&#039;, to anywhere. And that&#039;s job done. I believe there&#039;s a predefined rule for blocking known aliens on the WAN, but my memory is hazy in that respect.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first step, in m0n0wall at least, is to head into &#8216;System: Advanced&#8217; and check the box that says &#8216;IPv6 Support&#8217;. Without that, you won&#8217;t have half the options you need.</p>
<p>From memory, the GUI of pfSense is very similar, but to my knowledge it&#8217;s got very flakey support for IPv6 (or none, if you count only stable releases). I&#8217;d check that your build actually has v6 support first.</p>
<p>LAN: Add the IPv6 prefix in the appropriate box, enable RA.<br />
WAN: This is dependant on your ISP. Is it Andrews &#038; Arnold? If so, you just need to the &#8216;IPv6 mode&#8217; to &#8216;PPP&#8217;, and the routing of your prefix from the LAN to the world will &#8216;just work&#8217;. <img src='http://www.ninjabadger.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The firewall, from memory, doesn&#8217;t allow any v6 out by default (in contrast, it does for v4). On the &#8216;IPv6 Rules&#8217; page you should just be able to add a rule that allows anything from the &#8216;LAN subnet&#8217;, to anywhere. And that&#8217;s job done. I believe there&#8217;s a predefined rule for blocking known aliens on the WAN, but my memory is hazy in that respect.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IPv6 on m0n0wall by wiz561</title>
		<link>http://www.ninjabadger.net/2010/02/17/ipv6-on-m0n0wall/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>wiz561</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ninjabadger.net/?p=124#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m attempting to do this same exact thing with pfsense intead of m0n0wall.  

A few questions...

- Did you just put in the IPv6 address (2001:400::/64) in the &quot;LAN&quot; tab, and put the gateway in?
- Did you have to enable rtadvd?  DHCPv6?  
- Did you have to enable any firewall rules?
- Did you have to do anything to the WAN interface?

My ISP gave me a /64.  There&#039;s not many tutorials out there on how to configure pfsense/m0n0wall with a single /64 space. I&#039;m hoping that you can shed some additional light on how you got it working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m attempting to do this same exact thing with pfsense intead of m0n0wall.  </p>
<p>A few questions&#8230;</p>
<p>- Did you just put in the IPv6 address (2001:400::/64) in the &#8220;LAN&#8221; tab, and put the gateway in?<br />
- Did you have to enable rtadvd?  DHCPv6?<br />
- Did you have to enable any firewall rules?<br />
- Did you have to do anything to the WAN interface?</p>
<p>My ISP gave me a /64.  There&#8217;s not many tutorials out there on how to configure pfsense/m0n0wall with a single /64 space. I&#8217;m hoping that you can shed some additional light on how you got it working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

